Friday, March 13, 2009

The Future of Church

In the last few days, a survey revealing the diminished numbers of Christians has prompted a lot of discussion and speculation about the future of Christianity, and how churches should change and/or have changed to face the coming years and decades. Just a few of the facts, and my immediate reaction:

- The percentage of Americans claiming no religion jumped from 8.2% in 1990 to 15% in 2008.
- People claiming 'None' religion are the only group to have grown in every state of the Union.
- 76% of people identify themselves as Christians in America, down from 86.2% in the 1990s.

I see the direction of these numbers as positive, but still largely inflated by cultural Christian-ism, to borrow Andrew Sullivan's term from his article in Time a few years ago. In my humble opinion, Cultural Christianism has been co-opted by many a political and religious wolf in sheep's clothing, so the faster that cultural and non-practicing affiliation with the Christianity shrinks, the better off everyone is. Or to put it another way, I see no way that these numbers reflect spiritual reality.

If these trends continue, however, there is no doubt that society, culture, and the nature of churches will change dramatically. The Christian Science Monitor provides predictions on a possible evangelical collapse:

Within two generations, evangelicalism will be a house deserted of half its occupants. (Between 25 and 35 percent of Americans today are Evangelicals.) In the "Protestant" 20th century, Evangelicals flourished. But they will soon be living in a very secular and religiously antagonistic 21st century.

This collapse will herald the arrival of an anti-Christian chapter of the post-Christian West. Intolerance of Christianity will rise to levels many of us have not believed possible in our lifetimes, and public policy will become hostile toward evangelical Christianity, seeing it as the opponent of the common good.

Millions of Evangelicals will quit. Thousands of ministries will end. Christian media will be reduced, if not eliminated. Many Christian schools will go into rapid decline. I'm convinced the grace and mission of God will reach to the ends of the earth. But the end of evangelicalism as we know it is close.


Back to the ARIS survey:

Most of the growth in the Christian population occurred among those who would identify only as "Christian," "Evangelical/Born Again," or "non-denominational Christian." The last of these, associated with the growth of megachurches, has increased from less than 200,000 in 1990 to 2.5 million in 2001 to over 8 million today. These groups grew from 5 percent of the population in 1990 to 8.5 percent in 2001 to 11.8 percent in 2008. Significantly, 38.6 percent of mainline Protestants now also identify themselves as evangelical or born again.


My experience with non-denominational churches is that they are often intellectually shallow, emotionally driven, and unchallenging in terms of accountability or commitment. If my anecdotal evidence is consistence with truth, then is the following prediction a good thing?

Expect evangelicalism to look more like the pragmatic, therapeutic, church-growth oriented megachurches that have defined success. Emphasis will shift from doctrine to relevance, motivation, and personal success – resulting in churches further compromised and weakened in their ability to pass on the faith.

It seems that all churches are searching for an identity, and turning to labels I don't fully understand. The "emerging" church seems to be trying to recapture the vitality found in small communities of believers actively living their faith with humility and grace. The "missional" church is placing a priority on the social work required of those who seek to follow Christ's example. "Orthodoxy" connects believers to the centuries of followers before them through spiritual discipline, theological study, rituals and traditions. And evangelicals work to spread the saving message of a new life in Christ.

I say that the only correct path is e) all of the above. Without the modern labels, the issues are humility, grace, social work, spiritual discipline, rituals, tradition, intellectual search for truth, and salvation. These are all great old ideas straight from the scripture. But my understanding is that these were not and are not meant to compete against each other, with some being printed on banners while others are ignored. So while I have no idea what Christianity or the Church will look like in the future, I hope that it may reflect a more whole image of Jesus Christ to a world sorely in need of his love.

3 comments:

Jonathan Barlow said...

I would have to agree with your snapshot of the church. Maybe a little harsh on the nondenominational churches (as they vary as much from one to the other as they are similar), but if you are painting with a broad stroke it's pretty accurate.

As far as the labels are concerned it is my opinion that people have to make those in order to understand what they they are getting into these days. We are living in a advertisement enriched environment that deems every decision to have some type of marketing angle. Which I disagree with but also find myself yielding to as a minister. But the concepts you listed at the end of your hopes for the church are dead on "humility, grace, social work, spiritual discipline, rituals, tradition, intellectual search for truth, and salvation." Those churches that define success these through these lenses will be successful in the Kingdom of God, but may not herald many people hanging from the rafters either. (it might but it isn't the goal) But let us not remember that many left Jesus' ministry as time wore on. Great post and who knows what God has in store for the catholic church. (the church as a whole not the Catholic piece of it) I believe that God has a plan and we have a responsibility to be intimately involved in it. Beyond that I have to have faith.

Anonymous? said...

This is a good blog that I hope to contribute more to, but in reading it and also reading Jonathan's post I am reminded of one of my favorite points made by Dr. Sapp in a recent service. This is paraphrased as best I can remember it.

When people ask me how big my church is I tell them "oh, about 50 feet wide, 100 long, and has a nice tall steeple in the front". I know what they're really asking, how "successful" is your church... but I don't often get asked "how well does your church know Christ?"

That isn't the exact statement and if I got the statements a little off, I'm pretty sure I got the idea right, and it struck home to me.

Anonymous said...

A well-written post and two interesting comments from Mssrs. Barlow and Boyle.

Hard to contribute anything beyond what has been written. Overall, I found the Christian Science Monitor piece to be a little overblown. Still, it usefully reminds us not to be complacent. Movements -- political and religious -- lag when their proponents stop teaching. Ironically, teaching becomes much harder as a focus when a cause is successful in bringing new individuals to it.